VULKAN MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, OSLO, NORWAY

Based on a long term integral vision a private developer was able to create a mixed use urban area, that has both a mix in old and new buildings and programs. The development was based on the principles of sharing, high environmental ambitions and high quality.
Monofunctional areas | Envisioning Financing Mainstreaming
Source: Book of Ideas Transforming for Intensified Use: https://issuu.com/suburban.reinventingthefringe/docs/20170929_bookofideas_oslo_final4
Source: Book of Ideas Transforming for Intensified Use: https://issuu.com/suburban.reinventingthefringe/docs/20170929_bookofideas_oslo_final4
Keywords: Financial Engineering | Low Carbon | Public spaces | Sharing Economy | Urban Renewal

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Vulkan Factory is a former foundry located beside the Akerselva river in Oslo. When the foundry closed in the 1960s, the site was used for storage and craft businesses, sealed off from the rest of the city. The redevelopment of the Vulkan site started in 2004 with high ambitions of sharing land and resources in a dense and multifunctional area. Vulkan is now reconnected to the river and links two neighbourhoods. The buildings there are an interesting mix of new and old, giving identity to the new neighbourhood. The mixed use result is impressive compared to other projects.

 

Envisioning

The location, the topography and the people’s perception of the place made the developer think that he needed to create a place. He took one very important decision: to set out a strategy to make a ‘little city’ within the city, based on a strong belief in four elements: culture, education, food and sports. This led to  a mixed use development. Also important was the decision to be environmentally ambitious. Today Vulkan is virtually self-sufficient energy-wise, for both heating and cooling.

 

Mainstreaming: integrating management

There are different kinds of developers. The developer involved here has a long-term-vision and is used to staying on board for longer periods of time. For this developer a project is not finished when the buildings are built. An area takes time to evolve. They therefore did not sell every space, but rented out most of the functions except for the apartments which, in accordance with normal practice in Norway, are owner-occupied. By keeping the more vulnerable programs in ownership the developer is committed to the quality and use of these programs that are crucial for the attractiveness of the area in the long run.  

 

Financing: alternative financing

Finally sharing of services and spaces was facilitated, as in the car sharing arrangement. The developer encouraged offices to use the lunch and dinner restaurant of the PS:hotel as a canteen. This serves to reduce the size of offices and the PS:hotel gets a larger turnover. The Dansens Hus conference spaces can be rented by the hotels.

LESSONS LEARNED / RESULTS

By keeping ownership and working in an integral way extra investments in quality are profitable in other areas of the project. For example: preserving and maintaining the old Mathallen is profitable when we add up the indirect impact on the hotels, on parking revenue and the increased demand it is creating for office space.

Sharing (of energy, for instance) is easier in a mixed-use area, simply because different users may have complementary needs.

Especially for commercial functions, it is essential that there is one owner only, or alternatively several owners, but with a common management or at least common visions and goals.

Buildings are divided into different legal entities to provide for flexibility in the future structure of ownership. One or more offices or residential units may be sold while the developer retains ownership of the retail sections, which are accessible to the public. This provides the flexibility to shift spaces and functions within the project.

DATA

City information

Population size: 501 th - 1 m
Population development dynamics of the administrative city (at the time of the project): no data/not applicable
Population development dynamics of the functional urban area (at the time of the project): no data/not applicable
Website of the city: no data/not applicable


Project information

Project territorial focus: no data/not applicable
Project geographical area: no data/not applicable
Project type and size: building: no data/not applicable; area: 1-5 ha
Project main actors: no data/not applicable; Investors, private businesses
Project dominant property ownership: no data/not applicable
Project development stage (at the time of description): no data/not applicable
Project duration: no data/not applicable
Project starting date: no data/not applicable


Project References

http://urbact.eu/sites/default/files/media/20180315_fringe_200x267_small_0.pdf; https://www.vulkanoslo.no/en/about-us/;


Contact Person

Sverre Landmark, Aspelin Ramm Property